Las Vegas GF Chat Room

Which brings us to you always lying about yourself and your so-called "successful record".

So now you once again claim to be able to "post supportable evidence" of yourself--but of course, you never do. Hmmm....I remember Alan asking you at least a thousand times to post some of the info in that silly "PR Pkg." you strangely sent to him. Yet you always refused to do it, using the lame excuse of the info being "copyrighted"--foolishly thinking anyone would believe any of your bullshit.

This deceit is right up there with you never posting any of your picks BEFORE games are played, while we instead always get treated to your unsupported claims after the fact.

 

Time to keep the P-A-I-N level up: Presenting this week's Singer Five!

Den -3 over Indy
NYG +8 over GB
LAC -3 over Cleve
Det +3 over NE
Ten -2.5 over Wash

Quick summary: Russell Wilson will snap out of his funk this weekend; Aaron Rodgers just isn't mentally equipped enuf to play in another country; Justin Herbert is getting hot; Detroit is SO much better than this troubled Patriots team; and the Tennessee running game is too much for the Redskins. Yes I said it--the REDSKINS!

 

I remain surprised by Russell Wilson. He really IS washed up. That loss to the Patriots in the Super Bowl changed the poor guy forever and he'll never get over it.

One consolation prize from this loss for me tonight: redietz thought he was being clever by once again dovetailing on my pick by claiming he had Denver at halftime. But it backfired on him.

The silver lining of Undeniable Truth.....

 

Wilson will gel with bronco offence by mid season. He’s actually carrying the team on his $245 million. Forget about the fans , clueless like Diet Coke no ice , Wilson does enough during the game to show he’s still got it , time for teammates to harden the fuck up and get on page one. I would not bet on bronco until round 8-9 and be selected at that. save you cash for a couple of weeks, few more interesting wins available until then at least on other teams. Cheers

 

Wilson is coming to an appreciation of how much better the receiving corps was in Seattle than in Denver. The Bronco receiving corp is a C at best by NFL standards. DK Metcalf and Lockett are an elite tandem. When you look at failed QBing in Denver the last few years, the element they have in common is the pedestrian receiving corp. Those receivers in Seattle are making Geno Smith look pretty good.

 

Good post totally agree.

 

We have heard that Wilson is likely a first ballot HoFer. He beat a strong Manning team and just barely lost to a Brady team in SB's in his first two years. Since then however, he's been a very good, good, and now fair QB who's in jeopardy of not being a HoF member someday.

You NEVER blame a bad series of games (as in the first five games this season) on "non-elite receivers". He doesn't, and he's right. It's HIS fault he's throwing erratic and inaccurate passes, and he admits it. For some reason he's not the same as he used to be. Brady had many years with mostly pedestrian receivers. How'd THAT work out?

I'm willing to give RW two more games to show me he's among the best. That HUGE contract they gave him is certainly making the fans uncomfortable. Did you hear them booing Wilson even when Denver was ahead? Turns out he deserved every bit of it...along with the obvious bashing he's taking on Denver sports talk radio today and until he plays a good game.

 

Agreed a good tradesman NEVER blames his tools.
In this situation Wilson can’t blame his tools , but if you read between the lines he takes responsibility for “erratic,inaccurate passes” which is layman’s speak for “ these receivers suck and are too slow to get up to my standards of play, the standard I achieved in my career”
He would equally be conscious of his buy in price if he dissed his “team” so he humbly takes the blame for his recalcitrant offensive lineup. Those puppies are suffering from greenback envy and will never get to the desired level they need to be at if they continue with their childish antics, their listening to public opinion re booing Wilson certainly cements their lack of performance as a professional as deplorable.

Who was that qback for Houston few years back? He used to buy the team meals etc to compensate for his huge buyin price , he KNEW he had no talent but was lucky enough to jag the big payday jackpot. His team actually rallied around him.

So is this what bronco team want ? Wilson to share his wealth? The problem is Wilson has talent and deserves every penny he was signed for. Time the rest of the team lifted their standards , time bronco fans pulled their envious heads in and start demanding the rest of the team to do THEIR JOB.
Wilson is doing his job.
Cheers

 

Season-to-date:
3-2
1-4
4-1
4-1
2-3

No parlays hit yet. I bet a total of $700/week, and I'm slightly behind at this point. I don't keep track because money won/lost isn't important for this overall lesson for redietz.

 

I know how challenging math can be, so I'll do it for him.

Games: 14-11 (Quite good)
Units: 16-14 (Not quite as good)
Parlays Added: 16-19 (More than "slightly behind")

I want to thank Mr. Singer for explaining that money won/lost isn't important when he's betting sports. That's quite a lesson.

Road to 68%: If Singer wins his next eight in a row, he'll be almost (but not quite) on schedule to hit 68%. I'll be more than happy, since Rob's stated goal and previous claim was that he won 68% ATS, to explain what would be necessary going forward to accomplish that.

 

What an idiot. Parlay bets are for ancillary fun and have nothing to do with my going at least 68%ATS for the regular season. Units/money won/lost at $100 per mean nothing to me because of why I'm doing this ...and the little fact that I'm coming off a recent over $1.6mil payday on MY expertise--video poker.

Here's some help for the overly addicted: If I were betting tonight's game it'd be LV +7.

 

Your parlay bets aren't counting towards your 68% ATS. Nobody said they were.

You need to win eight straight to get back on close-to-schedule towards the stated 68% ATS claim. Parlays have nothing to do with it.

Do the math. How hard is figuring out that 11 losses requires 22 wins to put you in range of 68%? You have 14 wins currently, therefore eight in a row will put you almost on schedule. And I'm cutting you a break, using game percentage instead of unit percentage.

Welcome to being monitored. I should be charging you. LOL.

 

You're stating the obvious with every post. Like it takes a professional salesman to figure this stuff out after-the-fact. Trying to sound like some famous handicapper with a good knowledge of lines and percentages only creates a whole lot of belly laughs.

Wise up.

By the way....how's my advice for tonight's game looking? Does that qualify for a "pick" even tho I didn't bet it? You know---like Dan.

 

No it doesn't. This pick was a very typical degenerate gambler, taking a "shot". I see it all the time in casinos. If players get away with it, it amounts to a free roll, and if they don't no harm (unless they try it too many times at the same location). This is exactly what this pick was. If it won, you wanted it counted and if it lost, you wouldn't have wanted it counted. Had you really wanted to include this pick, you could have by definitively stating this was an official pick. You didn't do that. Nice try, goofball.

It is funny, how you use the term "wise up" so often, because the sad thing is for you, that everyone is already wise to you and your little games. You aren't fooling anyone old fella.

 

What a dummy! Here's a hint: when there's a it means I'm having EVEN MORE FUN than I have been with you idiots and my picks!!

And leave it to you to equate my not betting on it to being a degenerate gambler. What a fool--you were actually being serious about the whole thing! Here's something else to ponder---redietz and his phantom picks that he suddenly made after the games are played. I made his old face red with this one valueless pick tonight.

If this is any indication of how you and red are gonna find yourselves reacting when I finish at 68% or better, I'll be praying night and day that you don't die of monkeypox or aids, and he doesn't drive off a cliff!

 

1) I don't understand your point about games counting or not counting based on whether you bet them. What difference does it make if you bet them? Or bet them for a buck? Dan is pristine with his record keeping. He counted what should have been a push as a loss.

2) You had a choice, as usual, whether to state your game results, your unit results, or your gambling results. You didn't report all three. You reported the most favorable of the three, which is also the result that is least gambling-accurate. So I did the simple math, which you refused to do. I will continue to do the simple math.

3) If you want to count the Raiders as a win, be my guest. LOL. While you're at it, I still have that $499 to wager against your signed dollar bill ("to the real winner") regarding that 68% ATS claim, picking five NFL sides per week. Let me know when you ship the dollar off to Boz.

I'll check back next week and do the math again for you. No, don't thank me. You're discovering what it's like to be monitored or to be in public competitions. It'll be a good lesson for you.

For those who think picking NFL outright winners and totals might be a useful skill, I suggest following my results in the "Obscure Contest Results" thread that I'll post later today under Sports.

 

With the infrequent sports betting I do, I choose to "keep it simple, stupid"...as compared to your basically meaningless choice to "keep it stupid, simple".

I pick 5 teams each week and they win, lose, or tie. I put a relatively small $100 bet on four games and $200 on the one I feel best about. Plus I parlay them at $100 just for kicks. I don't need to bet them but it adds a little interest for me.

The only goal I have is to finish at least 68% ATS for the 18-week season on the five games I picked each week. This would better my LVA 2-season record. As such, I keep track of my games won & games lost only. The "units" or whatever you call the money won or lost, is irrelevant. And if you knew what you were doing with your "monitoring" then you'd use real numbers when referring to money, which includes the vig.

The only reason I gave advice on last night's game is to show that, unlike you and the collection of thousands of other annoying "handicappers" who litter the landscape, I don't need to sell picks or make money off of other people in order to dole out help. And I do it all in advance.....

Now let's hear more about your contests, tournaments, books, podcasts, and records no one has ever heard of.

 

Good to know the money won or lost is irrelevant.

I'm not adding vig because vig is self evident. We can add it on at the end of the season.

Now are you betting that dollar or not? You're only getting 499-1 odds.

As for books nobody heard of -- thanks for the opportunity to link

Driving Southern by Ralph Bland, Paperback | Barnes & Noble® (barnesandnoble.com)

Barnes and Noble evidently heard of it. LOL.

 

Barnes and Noble loses $30-$40 million every quarter.

I've seen you advertise that book? all the time. WTF kind of gambling book is it anyway?

If you need money just say so.

 

Thanks for the opportunity to promote the book.

About 18 months ago, some writers approached me about contributing to their book featuring true coming-of-age stories with an automotive emphasis. At first I said I had nothing to really contribute as most of the cars of my youth were not the best with nothing fancy about them. But then one of the guys said he had seen a photo of me and group of youngsters posing in a cemetery in front of a car. I said, oh yeah, that wasn't my car, but I guess I do have a car-centric story to tell.

I had a couple of days to write it, but I managed to do it and I am honored that the editors found it interesting enough to include in the book. My story has a gambling theme. The other stories are all about coming of age driving and the cars we loved as teens.

As to Barnes and Noble, they must be like you playing parlays, Mr. Singer. I guess they don't need the money.