Roulette New Thread

Your argument is debunked. I replied to your nonsense You're wrong yet again.

 

No. Read the post and try to understand what I'm saying.

 

You are potentially harming people because of your incompetence. Nice work.

 

TwoUp, people on gambling forums don't care about the math.

Make no difference who's right or wrong to them.

What they want is handout.

Do up a rsim session, set it to public.

Explain how to place bets.

Makes money.

That's all the care about.

MJ just confirmed everything else other than handouts is irritating.

Hope you get the message.

Thanks for making your awesome posts.

Moving on.
Collecting as usual.

Cheers.

 

I do, and I know at least 3 others who do too. TwoUp is spreading dangerous nonsense here and members should know it. According to his calculations you will make at least 1u profit in more than half of all 69 spin sessions.
I'm sure Dr Sir, Benas and Ka2 will confirm that he is wrong, and maybe others who actually know what the hell they're talking about. And the fact that you didn't notice the error shows how clueless you are about the math, although you claim to have read graduate level texts.

You just don't get it, do you? You're so heavily invested in systems that you can't understand that there are others who don't believe that they work (for example, most people outside gambling forums).

Yes, it's irritating, but we're not looking for "handouts". Why should we want to be given systems which don't work? It's irritating because we know the math doesn't support your claims, but those who DO believe in systems can't test for themselves whether you're lying, or have just been lucky. So they may spend years and lose a lot of money chasing the dream, thinking that they just haven't figured it out yet. Misinformation, deliberate or otherwise, always has negative consequences.

The more systems are shown to not work the less chance there is of people believing in them.

 

Perhaps that may be how you think.
Who know.

I'm now certain majority of the members on here couldn't care less about the math.

The couldn't care less about the rx or rsim charts.

Turbo's chart even if it were a million spins with zero reset is worth nothing.
So what.

Turbo has to play a short RS session, set it to public, explain how he place the bets.

That's all the members here want.

The rest is irritating bs to them. Fact.

Everyone is waiting for Turbo to set his rsim session to public and he writes the explanation how he place the bets.

If the bet turns out useless I pity Turbo for the jeers that follow.
This is his defining moment.
Hero or pariah.

 

Talking about proof.

You are wasting time writing all the math stuff here.

If Turbo or anyone play online casino, just show a video of your account balance.
People here believe the MONEY, who cares about the math. Fact.

And teach them how to make that MONEY.
That's all that matters.

The rest is irritating BS.

Lets CUT THE CRAP.

 

The crowd is using you, SAA and Benas to do the dirty work.

Who is stupid and who is wise?

 

I won't be jeering. And I'm guessing this isn't Turbo's best system. I think he's just trying to demonstrate the principle that you can make money betting on sleepers because "everything heads towards 1/37". He said himself he's curious about how long it will remain positive. You're exaggerating, as usual.

 

No exaggeration.

If he fails to convince his idea is a winning bet that makes real MONEY, he is a pariah.
Sad fact.

 

If Turbo would study the "random walk" he could see just how foolish his system is. They don't realize it, but they're attempting to exploit regression to the mean, which isn't possible because they don't fully grasp what it really means.

 

Like.

Herd's behaviour .. nothing new.
Hopes invested in & crumbling disappointments.

 

If Turbo is trying to demonstrate the principle, there's no reason to set his account to public.

He can post the graph.

 

How many times do you see 18 numbers without a repeat? not that many so you need a huge data set to test this strattegy.

 

It's easy to test using a small piece of code. I've done that. Waiting for 18 spins with no repeats doesn't change shit. Nothing. Nada.

 

Here’s a hint for you, very simple one. Other locations.

 

RNG data set used in your tests, not mine. Good luck.

 

Can we conclude that seeing a marquee of 18 numbers with no repeats on a real wheel can actually change/form/shape the behavior of upcoming outcomes?

 

I know thats not the point. Say you are wanting to test this. You need a minimum of 2000 events. Even with other locations that are a lot of spins of waiting time.

Also what is the logic behind this strategy that it would win?

 

YOU JUST GOT LUCKY
ENTROPY MY ARS..