Roulette Parx online fun lol

Oh my...betting Turbo's method works as well as betting the OPPOSITE of Turbo's method seems to work. Hmmm...I won't say it..I won't say it!!!

 

Any idea why do you prefer playing on a cartoon wheel with fake money, instead of playing against a Real Casino with real money, if you have 2 opposite systems that win more than they lose?. Thanks

 

Sir Anyone, one is based on repeats and the other is not and thats as far as i'll go with that.
Bago, i do. Just trying parx for fun and not claiming i have the HG

 

Congrats you two - keep climbing up the charts and ignore these people.
I proved without a doubt that it's not "fixed" by losing (well, can't seem to lose the last $2.00 lol).
If it were fixed then that could not have happened.
Like I said I was going to do - so now when they say my way of playing "failed" - at least I said that I was going to do that ahead of time, it won't matter. So it's not fixed - that can be removed from their limited arsenal of insults from the ignorant parade.
The spins also fall perfectly well within actual results (thanks RX !). So they can't say that it's not a realistic RNG game or that it doesn't reflect actual circumstances, etc etc.
They really have no leg to stand on - but they won't shut up. They don't know any better.
But hey - congrats and keep going ! I might just do it all again just to piss them off more lol.

 

Turbo,

Do you by chance have the number stream intact, showing the order in which the numbers hit?

I'd be interested in viewing it. I don't need to see how you bet. I just want to look at the number stream.

Thanks.

 

We know you are a pathological liar. What are you waiting for to play against a real wheel, you still have problems to connect to a real casino, your computer says No. lol fruitcake.

 

No problem, let me see what I can do. I can piece them together in order without too much hassle. I'll let you know when I get it done.

 

Bago,

It's ok to attack the message, but not the messenger. Chill.

 

Think you'll find most play both. And for me, Im always testing.
As shanks rightly said, Parx or wherever can give the chance to test with larger amounts than one could in money play and without emotional inhibitions that would cause hesitation in money play.
I'm careful and I enjoy figuring out the why's before putting into practice. Without the confidence and insight of knowing what your doing then discipline and emotion become bigger obstacles to overcome than most people realise.

 

Guys, playing on honest RNG can also be dangerous. YES, you will get a good confidence into a system, maybe even too much good, and because of playing with too high units (100-1000 times bigger) as you would play in real casinos, all that can have negative efect on your REAL playing in real casinos, with real money.

In casinos you WILL NOT find such an honest RNG machines, and you WILL NOT have such a big bankroll, so what will happen when a system will not work in some sessions so well as in Parx ??? It will not be Turbo's fault!! (OK, maybe a little, because he too much insist that a system CANNOT lose). Believe me, IT CAN, and will when you play against rigged machines- WITH REAL MONEY. Testing past spins is one, BUT total different can be when play in live!! (do not forget that!!!!)

 

Bago/Tony, please stop pushing on Turbo with 10 years old shit. You not know how he plays recently, but if you would know- you still will lose in some sessions, even more that in some, IF you will play on machines!! So mate, stay cool

 

He is right. Rng spin cant be tested.it gives you the sequence according to the bet placed .

 

10 years before he could be wrong but after 10 years more experienced could find the right way. More accurate through the every minute learning process. Stay positive man.

 

You guys keep saying that no way no way to exploit LOT. No use of this. Ok lets assume that bago has revealed turbos way of playing.lets assume again that bago is right.what it means? There is way to get certainity enough to get profit. In the same way turbo might have something .at least his explanation has some sense not bogus. And turbo,people will test on the basis of imformation that u have provided here not on the basis what u got in ur mind.

 

Stay cool and positive

 

I hope you lost real money Jefra, I warned everybody that his HolyGrail is the HolyCrap given enough spins and real casino conditions. You prefered to put a Like on each post of Turbo to know more about his system.

Sorry, what I do would prevent some newbies to lose real money like it just happened to you, by knowing what sort of dumb claims TurboGenius is used to, even if it was 10 years ago, you must admit that he didn't change.

Madi you are all wrong sorry, when someone is spending even 100 years (very very very experienced now with the game!) how to get an edge by analysing short term statistics based on roulette randomness, there is simply NO CHANCE (probability=0) that he could find an edge. Why Madi?. Because as long as Roulette exists as it is, 37 pockets and a return of 36 units, with independant events cannot be beaten, it's been centuries Madi, the greatest minds and clever people on earth studied this and their conclusion was the same.

Madi, there are certainly ways to exploit the game and get an edge only against favourable conditions, which can be a biased wheel, or tilted wheel with a ball that does not bounce much. Only against those good conditions, there is a possibility for the player to get an edge. It requires a lot of work, dedication and time to find what is exploitable.

But when someone like TurboGenius comes and claims that after only 5 spins, he is able to predict which numbers will become hot hmm no way.
Proof is when Snowman posted 150 spins from a Biased Double Zero Wheel (good for hot numbers), Turbo's method didn't detect the real biased numbers, you can check for yourself.

"Maths beat a Maths Game" often says TG, but when you check this topic where he is unable to make a simple and correct calculation, you must admit that if one day, one person on earth would find the HolyGrail to beat Roulette, it will never be TurboGenius

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/38-people-go-into-a-casino.2364/

 

Comeon man why u r so angry with him.he is also a human being . He can make mistake. He fixed it later

 

Madi, re-read the topic carefully, when the person corrected TurboGenius, this last told him to get a calculator to his psychiatrist, because TG is a cocky person who thinks in his ill brain that he is the master. You can see in the topic he considers himself in a classroom where he is the teacher. If TG was normal, he would have checked what this person had to say, but instead was quick to tell him he was wrong, whereas it was TG who couldn't make a simple calculation.

 

Turbo, please do not react to Bago comment about the 37 pockets and the 36 units return.

 

Well today was hard but ended a couple of million up (always wanted to say that).
Look i dont know how reliable parx is but find its been useful and surely an easy way to show its easy to win on parx is to open an account win a load and say "see" . It doesnt take long.
I thank people like Turbo for posting.