Blackjack KewlJ

KJ is strange, pathetic, and downright boring. Mdawg has definitely taken up residency in KJs head. He was up all night writing about Mdawg and at it again this morning. Man crush?

It's the same old boring crap. Dog barking at a glass of water. He really shouldn't try to be a forum bounty hunter. Dying ain't much of a living.

One would think KJ would be more worried about his Las Vegas haters closing him on him and a career that is toast.

Big [removed, pay to advertise] El Cortez guy holding KJ by his feet over his patio. Much more interesting.

His roommates must avoid him like the plague.

 

You are just completely nuts moses. I am up until midnight to 1am every night. Last night no exception. My last post was 12:31am. I post throughout the evening as I am watching sports and occasional movies.

None of this starts out personal with me. I call out claims that just can't be. Can't be because the defy math or the reality of how Las Vegas or the casino industry works. I don't call out every claim that can't be, but when they start being repeated over and over again, I will. And I make no apology for that. So there have been 4 really that I have called out. T3, Singer, Mdog and you. The response from 3 of these people (T3 excluded) was to attack me on a very personal level rather than explain how and why your claims defy math and how things work. I get it....you can't explain, so you attack, hoping and trying to discredit me.

So of the 4 you are a little different in that it wasn't your math that didn't work, Reno was the problem. A player can't do what you initially claimed (professional play) in RENO. You have since amended your claim down to supplemental or part-time type play (10k a year). So I really have no more problem with you other than you feel hurt so you want to keep this going and keep attacking me.

T3, Singer and Mdawg are all different than you. Their claims all defied the math. Couldn't be because the math didn't work. The problem is guys like that need someone to help them. They need a platform and a administrator that will not call out their claims based on math. T3 had Norm. I will never understand why Norm (a math guy) didn't call out T3's claims of playing with a 5% edge card counting? The only thing I can come up with was Norm's forum was still fairly new and T3 the leading poster by volume by a wide margin. Norm wanted the traffic.

Now Singer started way before I got involved. Alan who owned the forum at that time was his enabler. Alan who is not an AP, but a losing gambler, actually believed Singers bullshit and not only enabled him by providing the platform, but actually served as an accomplice, unknowingly or not. When Dan Druff bought the forum, it just became a matter of he didn't care enough to do anything other than very occasionally say Rob's claims just couldn't be. Druff mostly just let it go on because Druff was almost never there.

Mdawg, again like Norm, I can't explain why Shackleford allowed this BS that he knows is BS. He even signed an agreement not to say what he really thinks. How bizarre for a math expert. The only explanation I can come up with is that after selling the forum, Shackleford just doesn't care about much anymore. WoV is just an amusing toy for him these days. I hope today's announcement that "he is bending back towards the truth" is a sign he is starting to care again. That would put an end to Mdog. We will see what happens.

So anyway, the hate all comes about because these guys can't explain their claims that defy math, so they attack instead.

Now contrast that to me. There are people, not you haters mentioned but legitimate members that question some of what I claim. But my math clearly works. I can explain my slim advantage and play enough rounds at that advantage that it explains what I make almost to a tee.

I also am able to explain, in great detail what I do, and how I do it. (probably shouldn't explain it but I do). Right down to bet spreads I use, exit triggers, short sessions and for those that say everything I say comes from a book, I even discuss some things like tracking a second table when you can and spreading both ways (making your spread appear smaller) that have never been talked about in books. I am able to answer questions in great detail as I did in Blackholes thread and with you periodically about how I do what I do and how the math works.

You won't accept it but it is there. But these guys like T3, Singer and now Mdawg simply cannot explain how their claims defy math so they respond with attacks (again, T3 was respectful and did not attack). So you can hope and pray that I fail. You can hate. And decide you hate for things not even related to blackjack or advantage play, but it doesn't change a thing. I am a successful blackjack player, who plays by the math and can and do explain everything I do and I have every right to call out claims that just defy math and reality and I do so when I feel they have gone on to the point of harming other players.

 

14 essay posts about Mdawg in 17 hours. Similar to you ban record at WOV.

What did I initially claim? 30k? 50k? 100k?

You got a lifetime ban at BJTF because of T3.

You are not a forum bounty hunter. You run and hide.

All these claims had nothing to do with what I set out to accomplish. I'd still be playing if not for you.

 

DON S writes: KJ, You have a different understanding of my comments than you ought to. You read a single article, which you now take as the Holy Grail, and have decided that, because someone wrote something that you have interpreted as you see fit, it applies to every human being on the face of the earth, and that's just plain ignorant.

Tater says: What do you really know about math? You lack education. Your head explodes anytime someone suggests anything other the Hilo.

As to your medical assessment. Just because you need mental help doesn't mean you're an expert on it.

 

This is just a lie and YOU know it. IF you received a backoff or heat last fall, it had nothing to do with me.

I don't know what you claimed as far as monetary numbers. I don't really remember any claim of numbers. What I remember is that you claimed to be a professional sports bettor and blackjack player in Reno. I didn't say much about the sports betting stuff. That is not really my field. But a player cannot play blackjack professionally in Reno. It just can't be done Reno is too small (not big enough rotation of games) and too sweaty. Now if you had specified that your idea of playing blackjack professionally was 10k a year, I would have said nothing.

I am not going to go back and try to look for a number as far as monetary amount because it is on Norms forum and I don't know what has been deleted and what hasn't over there.

 

For one thing. I hate the term professional. I suppose I could say I was a professional installer. Made about $250k in those years. I suppose I could say I was a professional sales rep. I did support a family on just my income.

Playing blackjack and betting on sports was like being on scholarship in college. All I had to do was play well and stay out of trouble. Pretty much everything was paid for. Plus I did manage to bank $100k without being employed.

You said you had my name for several years and could've turned me in whenever you chose.
You refuse to say how you got it. If you did have it then what was your excuse for telling lies.

 

You guys are ridiculous with your quotes. You quote something said totally out of context. Mdog has been doing that with numerous people and just today Mission requests if Mdog continues to quote him, to link to where the quote is from for context, because in almost every case it is not the context Mdog and now you are using it.

It is like if I have a conversation with xxxx and I say Michael Jorden was the best basketball player of all time and xxxx says I am wrong that Lebron James is. You guys post that xxxx says I am wrong and nothing about the context. That is just dishonest. But it is what you troll types do.

yes, I play hi-lo. I am a proponent of hi-lo, because based on diminishing returns so called higher counts just don't add much value vs the effort. And that becomes more true, not less as games and conditions decline. I played a level 2 count for 18 months and came back to hi-lo because it allows me to employ several advanced techniques that are more compatible with simplicity than higher counts.

So yes, I am a proponent of hi-lo, but this idea that I am anti-other counts is ridiculous. I network with players that play other counts.

 

I don't care if you hate the term professional. I play for a living and have supported myself solely from my play for 18 years. That is the very definition of professional. I have every right to use it and I will continue to use it.

And there is a reason to use it on forums. When I read a forum that say I am not familiar with everyone, you might have one player say this and another say that. I am more interested in the player that plays for a living's opinion and experiences than the guy who works as a banker and plays 2 Saturdays a month. The professional player knows and has experienced more. That is not to say things can't be learned from a recreational, part-time or supplemental player, but a professional player has experienced everything. He knows what he is talking about.

 

This nervous poodle of a spends all his waking hours worrying about others and their genuine casino play. Unfortunately for the UNKewl one, this sort of obsession has come back at him in force, as others have decided to make the UNKewl one, their business, and take him down! It's lucky I don't have time to devote to the UNKewl one other than bashing him online, because if I had made him my hobby the way he has made me his, he'd already be K.O.'ed out of the casino play ring!

Not that he plays much anyway. Out of tens of thousands of dribble posts he's never described an actual hand of blackjack. He's just recounting what he read in some books.

accountinquestion on the UNKewl one: Literally, your story is something anyone who cares enough could figure out via books and reading the internet. While I find your stuff interesting to read, you've never said anything interesting except for some story you told me in private. I believed it but now I wonder if I wasn't just fed bullshit. At the time I thought you were a legitimate person and have taken things from that convo as true. I now believe this was a mistake.

JBS on the UNKewl one: "No matter how he acts online." Well, at least that makes a truthful statement about what a he is.

 

Perfect example of your dishonesty in taking quotes out of context. Here is the exact quote of JBS talking about you and I:

 

KJ writes: So yes, I am a proponent of hi-lo, but this idea that I am anti-other counts is ridiculous. I network with players that play other counts.

Taters says: Oh brother. Anytime someone suggests a side count, or doing something different. You go into a rant. Just like you are doing now.

 

The statement stands on its own because it comments on what a you are online!

 

It is a level of deceit and dishonesty rarely seen, even from an attorney.

 

Well, as a "professional" installer. I lost my biggest account. Her words were "I'm sorry I have to do what is best for my family and biz."

Translation? I'm toast.

So I found a struggling wholesale supplier. My idea was to take the wholesale price and service to the consuming and booming public. Then we decided to duplicate myself with franchise opportunities. I didn't want salesmen. I wanted guys I could train to install. The product sold itself and I knew keeping up would be than main issue.

That account came to me a few months later and complained they couldn't compete with me or my guys. My response? "I'm sorry I have to do what is best for my family and biz." Man, that felt good.

Someday KJ will fail and lose his biz.

 

I had to learn a different language in blackjack. BJTF is all about True Counts and many variations of same.

I'm about ratios, columns, and percentages.

So once I learned how true counts converted to percentages, I was able to play within casino tolerance and make a worthwhile profit. Until KJ or one of his secret pack ratted me out.

Because it's somewhat complex, for uneducated KJ, he made all these assumptions. Actually it's quite simple.

Put your money where your mouth is. Pro or not. I can take your money. Easy peasy.

 

KJ might be a forum writer pro. But that is about it. Can't chase variance if you don't play.

His Las Vegas haters are closing in.

 

MDAWG WRITES: This nervous poodle of a spends all his waking hours worrying about others and their genuine casino play. Unfortunately for the UNKewl one, this sort of obsession has come back at him in force, as others have decided to make the UNKewl one, their business, and take him down! It's lucky I don't have time to devote to the UNKewl one other than bashing him online, because if I had made him my hobby the way he has made me his, he'd already be K.O.'ed out of the casino play ring!

Tater says. Ohhhh Happy Day.

 

This poor fool could not make it clearer: HE IS THE MOST TORTURED SOUL IN THE HISTORY OF ONLINE CONCOCTIONISTS!

It's just way too funny watching nearly everybody everywhere laugh at and make fun of him for being a proven liar about his BS blackjack claims, and how so many successful people just bother the shit out of him.

If there's ever been anybody more incapable of trying and trying to change other people's opinions about himself, that person hasn't been born yet.

OK kew-- let's hear the one about how you can "count two tables simultaneously" again! After all, aren't "professionals" better at B's than recreationals?? Hahahahaha!!!

 

Wow. I thought this post cut the UNKewl one open like a fish, but RobSinger's takes the cake!

 

That's a true excoriation of kew by the site's administrator....and a poignantly true one. It identifies how full of shit he always is. No wonder he's always complaining about how the VCT administrator never cares to nuke those who take glorious turns bloodying kew (which is nearly everyone). Nobody in power listens to proven liars and whiners like him!