Blackjack The Asylum: BlackjackTheForum (BJTF)

We called it “The Norman Bates Motel” in this thread:

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/current-feud-with-qfit-norman-wattenberger.6635/

A notable chronic resident there recently described his… residence even more… notably:

"THE LUNATICS ARE BEGINNING TO RUN THE ASYLUM."

An asylum, indeed. Proofs here:

https://www.blackjacktheforum.com/showthread.php?42153-Why-bother-doubling




The Don of psychosis refers to new lunatics. He is chronic and he’s been running that asylum for over a decade now. He proves his protracted condition in that very thread. Psychodon, a blackjack “Hall of Famer”, states that doubling down results in more losing hands but winning more money!!! How is that for mathematics from a self-proclaimed “expert” blackjack mathematician??? Lose more hands but win more money!

In truth, doubling down in blackjack results in around 60% winning hands. That’s the reason doubling down is strongly advised under clear circumstances. Read real mathematics:

https://forums.saliu .com/card-counting-blackjack.html#reversedcounting
Blackjack Double-Down Hands, Reversed Count.

· Norman Wattenberger und Don Schlesinger form the “Berlin Wall” of The Asylum.

Norman Bates is also in the habit of dumping evidence in the swamp nearby. Therefore saving proofs is in tall order. Here is how PsychoDon reckons the “math” of doubling down in blackjack:

· “If there is more money to be made by doubling, do you have a different goal? Would you prefer to win more hands but less money or FEWER HANDS AND MORE MONEY? Do you derive your satisfaction from winning the greatest number of hands or the most amount of money? If not the latter, consider quitting the game.”

It ain’t “fewer” hands, stupidiot! The players win around 60% of their double-down hands. That means they win more double-down hands. And that’s why they win more money when doubling down! 60% is greater than 50%.

 

Just look at the first page of this Blackjack Forum. Most threads here are simply copies of threads started in The Asylum (BJTF). They all end with Source: links to BJTF. Today, April 26, 2019, I can see the following bombing threads reposted from The Asylum (aka Norman Bates’ Motel):


1. Blackjack Jeopardy
2. Blackjack Caesars casinos free play
3. Blackjack Casino Vérité needs tuneup (advertising for Norman Bates’ software)
4. Blackjack Which casino chain do or do not share data base?
5. Blackjack What do we mean by "spread" - 1 hand total or 2 hand total?
6. Blackjack When do I start attracting attention?
7. Blackjack Maybe Counters Don't Have it so bad after all
8. Blackjack Harrahs Cherokee cheating
9. Blackjack The odd case of 4,4 vs. 2
10. Blackjack Does side counting aces benefit hi lo or wong halves?
11. Blackjack blackjack amateur
12. Blackjack If anyone cares to see what my last 70 Hours have looked like.
13. Blackjack Looking for Snowbird Destination With Casinos Nearby
14. Blackjack An alternative to computing true count
15. Blackjack Would you believe this.....
16. Blackjack Why bother doubling?
17. Blackjack Casino Road trip from Las Vegas
18. Blackjack Spot Play

I. The reposting is blatant bombing of GamblingForums.
There are 18 copycat threads from The Asylum (BJTF). They push down threads that are not BJTF-firiendly. On the contrary, one thread in particular is blatantly hostile to Norman Wattenberger — and rightfully so. The thread Current feud with Qfit (Norman Wattenberger) was pushed way down, outside page #1 of this forum. Mind you, it is a very popular thread, with almost 17,000 views! Nothing else here comes even close.

II. The reposting is shameless advertising for Norman Wattenberger’s forum and software.
The Source at the end of every copycat thread links to BJTF. BlackjackTheForum gets juicy links that increase its SEO score.

Meanwhile, the SEO score of GamblingForums takes a hit that pushes it down in Internet searches. Here is convincing proof. The popular thread Current feud with Qfit (Norman Wattenberger) was pushed way down in Google searches. That thread secured a solid position #3 on the “historic” query norman wattenberger (February 19, 2018). It is outside page #1 now and it will drop further…

Norman Wattenberger does NOT allow reposting on his forum under any circumstances. The threads are deleted immediately (N0rm never sleeps!) The authors are also banned in a hurry (again, Norman Bates never sleeps!)

There is a lesson to be learned here…

 

The bombardment continues unopposed. Norm… er, 21forme even creates polls in GamblingForums. All bombs linkback to The Asylum (BJTF).

Meanwhile, my posts hardly get thru… not even 10% of them…

 

The bombardment continues unopposed. Norm… er, 21forme even creates polls in GamblingForums. All bombs linkback to The Asylum (BJTF).

Meanwhile, my posts hardly get thru… not even 10% of them…

Sorry for posting it first in another thread dedicated to The Asylum.

 

All this site is is posts stolen from other sites or a bunch roulette/baccarat loser tards. F this site!

 

I'm confused Mr. P. Are you saying Norm is posting threads from BJTF on GamblingForums in order to generate more views to his own site?

SEO?

Evidently I missed it. Why wouldn't the Admistrator of Gamblingforums simply take the same action of deleting threads immediately?

 

Let interested gamblers know who the real scammers and crooks are. Those who never gambled seriously, but have always encouraged gamblers via books, software, systems to spend their money. Norman Wattenberger and Don Schlesinger are two of the most notorious. Keep reading a thread that puts together the most relevant threads:

Paranoia Runs Deep in ‘The Asylum’ (BJTF).

 

Say it ain't so Joe! Are you saying Norm and Don are and have been in cahoots with casinos all along?

 

Exactly so, Six-Pack Joe! Everybody’s investments are guarded by privacy laws in any civilized nation. But you can bet baby-milk money that the two listed in my post — and several more “bishops, saints, gurus” of the card-counting cult — do own stocks in the casino business. Some are or were paid directly by the casinos (as employees, or consultants, or promoters).

That’s why they so mouth-foamingly oppose anything that hurts the casino interests. I’ve experienced that diabolical reaction since I entered Cyber World. It was Norman “Bates” Wattenberger who first met me with his sword in the year of grace 1999. I certainly crushed him, but the zombie raised and keeps walking…

Norman “Bates Shkiottorban” Wattenberger: Narcissist, Crook, Abuser of Laws.

 

Six Pack Joe. Now that's funny. But I was referring to the scandal in baseball when the Chicago White Sox were fixing games. I think it was 1918.

Interesting. Norm is definitely very sensitive in that regard. But I've read Don just blast away at casinos to the point of wanting to cover my eyes. Calling them idiots, frauds, etc, etc. Oh no Don, don't say that, they are already as rattled as a skeleton on a metal roof. Are you saying that's positioning?

 

More news in the master thread:

“Current feud with Qfit (Norman Wattenberger)”.


And here is a relevant screenshot depicting a truly… pathological liar:

https://saliu .com/ScreenImgs/NormW/NormWLegalLies.gif

https://saliu .com/ScreenImgs/NormW/ NormWLegalLies.gif

 

Viciousness and crookery deserve attention — always in the form of warning. Unsuspecting humans deserve to know and stay safe from such viruses.

“The Norman “Bates” Wattenbergers and Don “Raging Bull” Schlesingers of the world are krooks, and mooks, and bazooks. They strongly promote blackjack as a professional game, but they have never practiced it professionally. They lost big early in the game, and they ran away from casinos. Yet, they discovered the card-counting scheme in blackjack would greatly favor the casinos financially. Therefore they invested big-time in casino stocks… but they admitted it only after they were exposed. And they still sell books and cook-the-book software worshipping card-cunting!” 3:14

To that end, we must keep atop this elemental thread: “Current Feud with Qfit (Norman Wattenberger)”:
• https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/current-feud-with-qfit-norman-wattenberger.6635/page-14#post-97428/