1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Join our $5,000 Cash Giveaway!

    Win Cash by Posting and Inviting New Members!
  3. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play sub-forum.
    Dismiss Notice

Baccarat How many of you cats would wager on player after seeing the 3 ppp streaks pop?

Discussion in 'Baccarat Forum' started by soxfan, Jun 9, 2021.

  1. Rinad

    Rinad Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2020
    Likes:
    78
    Location:
    colorado
    I would bet that one would have to wait BBBBBB (6 bankers) in order to get the same results as PPPP.
    since banker wins a little more it has to be adjusted but probably get good results, and one should have to be play both sides to earn enough by the way.
     
  2. fathead

    fathead Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2018
    Likes:
    95
    Location:
    USA
    I tried that and longer. Nothing was profitable. It is better to stick with the Banker side on this strategy.
     
    Nathan Detroit and soxfan like this.
  3. soxfan

    soxfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Likes:
    488
    Location:
    FrozenTundra
    Cats need to think of things logical. The 1,2,3 players streak gonna account for 87.5% of all streaks event! So, how often are ya gonna win betting p after a 3players streak pop? It really is a lousy, coconut proposition to do so but that's why casino love the trender and this is why casino capture 20% return on their baccarats action. And it;s an even more lousy, coconut proposition for a cat to wager p after the 4 players streak pop cuz the 5 players streak only comprise less than 5% of all p streaks event. This is why tryin to make cake on streak/dom situation make no sense cuz by the time these dom/streak pop and you see them manifest they already exhaust most of their strength so yer bettin into weakness. This is why anti-streaks is such a solid style of play provided you only wager against p streaks and let the bankers streak skate, hey hey.
     
    Nathan Detroit likes this.
  4. soxfan

    soxfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Likes:
    488
    Location:
    FrozenTundra
    Knowledge of previous hand ain't relevant, only streaks distribution stat matter, hey hey.
     
    Nathan Detroit likes this.
  5. soxfan

    soxfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Likes:
    488
    Location:
    FrozenTundra
    And in facts if previous result have been streaks laden then even more likely that won't continue, hey hey.
     
    Nathan Detroit likes this.
  6. soxfan

    soxfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Likes:
    488
    Location:
    FrozenTundra
    Not for nuthin but I just eyeballed 100 party poker live dealt shoe and betting b after ppp give ya +49.5 units nest profits. And betting b after pppp give ya +9.5 units nets profits, hey hey.
     
    fathead likes this.
  7. Rinad

    Rinad Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2020
    Likes:
    78
    Location:
    colorado
    that is what I meant, not just last few hands.
     

  8. Jimske

    Jimske Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Likes:
    372
    Huh? 87.5% of all repeats of 3 or more is going to be PPP B ?? Only about 4-5 3 streak in an 8 deck shoe and about the same 4-5 streak of 4+. LOL that's why it's nearly a 50-50 game! Flat bet B against PPP is a losing proposition!

    It's amazing that you and Ellis haven't figured out that the casino get upwards of 20% for the very simple reason that people raise their bet and run out of MONEY or hit the table limit!

    Isn't it clear enough from Big Stack's OG that the only way to win on betting B only is to use regression along with progressions AND have a big stack!!! You may get away with flat bet that way as well but the practical considerations in time and $ make it a moot proposition.
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2021 at 1:32 PM
    Junket King likes this.
  9. Jimske

    Jimske Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Likes:
    372
    Your eyeball is the problem with ALL your testing, LOL.

    You continually push disinformation with no real documented stats to back it up.

    Eyeball these 25,000 shoes: https://wizardofodds.com/games/baccarat/basics/
     
    Junket King likes this.
  10. Junket King

    Junket King Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Likes:
    1,827
    Occupation:
    Professional Guesser
    Location:
    Tristan da Cunha
    Nobody is getting barred from a Baccarat table, more likely barred from the casino. Although my local casino once said to me, "do you play any other game beside Punto Banco :D
     
    Rinad likes this.
  11. Jimske

    Jimske Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Likes:
    372
    No, but I know people who are concerned about it and take measures.

    It takes a long time to get the boot due to variances. I think you'd need to show consistent winning over long periods, not just big wins. Baccarat is a game of big swings for a lot of players. Those swings make it very difficult for the casino to monitor. If you're winning so much they will just invite you back and THEN they will keep an eye on you.
     
    Rinad likes this.
  12. Junket King

    Junket King Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Likes:
    1,827
    Occupation:
    Professional Guesser
    Location:
    Tristan da Cunha
    Yeah, kind of confusing how somebody on this forum managed to make $200,000 pa over a consist 12 year period, that's only close on $2.4M, there is no emoji available that expresses how hard I'm laughing.
     
  13. Craps

    Craps Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2018
    Likes:
    249
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    True. Casino do ban people for winning. The fact that there is hardly any banning is because NOBODY wins big. The only winners are the fleas and Rats and casinos don't care unless they cheat.
    There is a high roller playing the DON"T with 25k and 150k lay and after winning 3 sessions of 1 million each, the casino decide to partially ban him. He can no longer reserve a game. He is not allow to shoot.
    He would reserve a game and have the dealers sent Ace, Deuce on the dice for the comeout roll and 5,2 on all rolls. He would tossed the dice above eye level and frequently not hitting the back wall. Casino is tired of reminding him of his infractions and decide to partially ban him. Talk about not getting edge over house? Tons of skillful people out there.
     
    Junket King and fathead like this.
  14. Rinad

    Rinad Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2020
    Likes:
    78
    Location:
    colorado
    Hey hey, I anderstand your point of streaks not continuing when you see swarms of them, and to your point I used to play and anticipate changes because of that, and that is also how a lot of players are betting on, for a change.
    but experience has taught me to do just the oposite, and to "go with the flow" just a tiny bet more and at the same time being aware that yes it will change.
    and that is what I believe the correct way to play after heavy loads of streaks.
    bet maybe just a one or a couple more time that it will continue ,But also be fully aware of getting to the end of the cigar.
    and that challenges the shoe every time that it has to end its streaks exactly the time I get in.
    so we get dragon by the tail of his streaks and are ready when he stops doing it.
    I play for the "now its happening", and at the same time I am fully aware that it has to end at anytime.
     

  15. Rinad

    Rinad Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2020
    Likes:
    78
    Location:
    colorado
    I like your THEN they will keep an eye on you ! until then they can care less for sure, very good point.
     
  16. soxfan

    soxfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Likes:
    488
    Location:
    FrozenTundra
    • Violation of Rule #1: Be Respectful
    Of course, a scared, chickens shit, loser recreational player like you or yer little beta bitch loser retard compatriot from across a pond can't figure it out. But, please do post up more random pics of chips and bank notes, as we are all suitably impress, hey hey.
     
  17. Jimske

    Jimske Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Likes:
    372
    Hahaha. Short pants. You should ask the Admin if you can make your little mantra a sticky. That way you don't have to keep typing the same childish stuff over and over.

    Party Poker play money.!!!! What a dope!
     
    Junket King likes this.
  18. Junket King

    Junket King Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Likes:
    1,827
    Occupation:
    Professional Guesser
    Location:
    Tristan da Cunha
    I posted those images solely for your perusal, glad to see it had the desired effect. With raking in $2.4M over a 12 year period, I thought our paths might have crossed in the VIP rooms maybe once, the globe is a big place. Obviously you were extremely successful with your gaming endeavours, yet chose to remain "local" in those 12 years, bar a single trip to Vegas. I take my hat off to you how you managed to pull this off.
     
  19. Jimske

    Jimske Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Likes:
    372
    He had no choice. He's an expat hiding from the authorities. Can't come to the u.s..
     
    Junket King likes this.

Share This Page