Blackjack KewlJ

My memory was years ago. But it stayed with me because it was where the rubber meets the road so to speak. If I'd split the 10s I would have won 4 hands at max. But it probably would've been that last hand I played at that casino.

 

Why bother with this clown, KJ?

Oh sure, playing "Whack-a-mole" can be satisfying, especially when you get to hoist the asshole up on his own petard, but I suggest you leave him to his own devices, i.e. chasing ambulances and spinning bullshit self-aggrandizing stories of casino daring-do.

That putz shot his wad long ago, he's just hanging around for rim jobs.

 

Of course MrV is the who felt so threatened by MDawg that he spent his days writing emails to all the casinos complaining that MDawg must be cheating in order to be winning so much.

 

Wrong: it was only one email.

Your effrontery irked me.

 

Well, if that sort of thing is all in the past and forgotten then perhaps MrV and I could stand shoulder to shoulder in the greatest new online game there is - picking on the runt of the litter weakling, the UNKewl one! Let's face it, it is only human nature to poke where poking provokes the greatest reaction.

 

Runts don't usually fight back: KJ does.

He's targeted in part because he's gay, and in part because he presents as a fairly easy target due to having previously admitted to having lied (as if none of us have ever lied, LOL).

I used to give him a hard time but I've accepted him for what he claims to be: a gay BJ AP with thin skin, a combative nature, and a desire to help those willing to listen and learn.

Tough to pull that off on these boards given the polarization, hostility, and anonymity.

 

Runts of the litter may be aggressive as some will have to do all it takes to ensure they survive.

In any case, UNKewlJ clearly is living a concocted online presence where he is unable to even describe a single hand of actual blackjack he has ever played. Mostly the UNKewl one just mumbles to himself repetitively in desperate attempts to get his point across.

accountinquestion on the UNKewl one: Literally, your story is something anyone who cares enough could figure out via books and reading the internet. While I find your stuff interesting to read, you've never said anything interesting except for some story you told me in private. I believed it but now I wonder if I wasn't just fed bullshit. At the time I thought you were a legitimate person and have taken things from that convo as true. I now believe this was a mistake.

The universal consensus - an inveterate liar, and - Despised.

monet on the UNKewl one: Nothing you post is 100% true.
From faking your own death to using multiple sockpuppets.
Like Coach said... you are constantly lying to the forums and you have admitted to it time and time again.

Mission146 on the UNKEWL one: Ironically, MDawg is actually much more of a verified real person than you are based on what you have now said. He was technically more verified before that, but you had a very long history that gave you some credibility on the forums. Now, you've lied about everything. Convincingly. Why should I believe anything a person says who has supposedly lied about literally everything except for that because...reasons? MDawg is definitely a high-rolling player.

 

Mr V. KJ is targeted because he targets others first. Easy to fight back on a forum.

I can only speak for myself. It has little to do with KJ being gay. I have people in family and friends I'm cordial with who are gay. He brings the gay part on himself. He lied and made it personal.

 

Quite right, the UNKewl one brought all this upon himself, by deciding that he was some sort of internet arbiter of what is or is not true. Unfortunately for him, all he succeeded in doing was confirming what most already knew - that he is an UNKewl liar.

 

I was thinking primarily about the crap he gets from Singerand others at VCT about being homosexual" they've weaponized it.

And yes, when you attack you need to prepare for a counterattack.

 

Do you have any proof of kew really being a homo?

The guy has told so many lies about himself and others that it's impossible to determine whether he is or not unless you walk a day or two in his underwear.

Either way, I respond as if he is because if he really isn't gay, he's still a very weak personality who's just BEGGING to be slapped around some. Why else do you think he goes after someone like Tater, who appears to be nothing other than an ordinary guy who plays BJ for a profit. Successful people irk him. Mdawg bothers him. I'm a big problem for him. The only reason YOU aren't, MrV, is because you say you don't generally win at gambling. So you remain within his comfort zone.

He easily gets agitated by people who report they win at gambling, no matter how or why they play. He claims out of one side of his mouth that he is a fan of AP's who say they win. But Axel makes fun of and scolds him. He absolutely hates mickey because of one single conclusion Mickey logically came to about me. And we've seen other "AP's" here and on other forums trade insults while having the usual "kew fights".

Bottom line, kew is an extremely jealous, extraordinarily impatient personality when it comes to other people saying they win in ANY manner. And why is that? BECAUSE HE IS A BJ ADDICT WHO LOSES, NOT WINS! And losers DO NOT LIKE WINNERS. PERIOD!

So simple, even a blind cave man could see it.

 

Your analysis begs the million dollar question which can and should be asked of all internet posts and posters: "What is Reality?"

Yes, of course many individuals choose to create false identities / legends about themselves and their actions for a variety of reasons, and absent objective verification it is up to us to weigh their claims and draw our own conclusions.

You and I have reached a different conclusion about KJ based on available information: it happens.

As to KJ, whether he is whom and what he claims is less important to a gambling forum than the info he presents about gambling, and in that regard I do not find him wanting; his info on blackjack AP seems likely to be of value to blackjack players (not my game), and his attacks on his detractors, while not necessarily masterful, provide some entertainment.

And that's why many of us come to these forums: to learn a bit, perhaps blow off a bit of steam on occasion, and of course to be entertained.

As always YMMV.

 

One point: if I wanted to be known as some under-the-radar winning bj pro on various forums (which in and of itself makes no sense) then all I'd need to do is have a couple of the industry's "playing professional bj" books available along with reading forums where known knowledgeable players post, then simply insert plagiarized information into numerous posts along with wildly ridiculous claims of year after year after years of winning. And PRESTO! anyone who doesn't believe I'm a cunning winner who's smarter than all casino bosses and eyes-in-the-sky everywhere, are going to get bashed by me!

It's what happens, when people have a failed real life. Their fallback position is concocting an internet forum life, claiming they need to post anonymously in order to keep their identity hidden from so-called "lurking casino employees"--none of whom have ever been unquestionably verifiable anywhere.

It's what true gambling losers do. Real pros who win couldn't care less about other people's claims or what anyone anywhere says about them.

 

I was watching the KU NCAA Championship game. What a great game to enjoy as a fan.

But all anyone could talk about was their parlay, over-under money line or points spread. I could care less.

So not only do I not care about the self professed AP pro and their profits, it puts the serious player at risk far more than helps the newbie.

We play a game we are not suppose to win.

 

MrV, you aren't going to win an argument with Singer. He resides in an alternative reality of what he wants to be true, not what is true.

Case in point: he keeps repeating how I am jealous of any winning player. Axelwolf, mickeycrimm, MaxPen, jbjb, Monet to name a few from VCT. Probably a dozen more at WoV including Wizard. Show me one time I have ever challenges any of these players regarding their play and/or claims. Not a single time...ZERO. Now I have occasionally had differences involving non-gambling trolling type discussions but again ZERO regarding their play.

Why? Because all play with an advantage that can back up and explain their claims.

And this is where Singer and Mdog differ
Their claims DEFY the math. And so yes I and others have every right to challenge them. Singer's repeated jealousy nonsense is just more Singer BS.

 

KJ, it seems to me that you catch a lot of flak from people who claim not to believe your claims; it is the lack of objective proof the helps fuel the controversy.

So then, maybe it's time for some objective proof?

I understand your need to protect your actual identity from mean-spirited detractors.

One method of objectively proving your claims initially come to mind, and it would involve using a trusted third party, if such an individual can be found and agreed upon: I nominate prominant LV attorney Robert Nersesian as he can keep a secret and he already knows you.

You would show him all your tax returns and supporting documentation for the past seven to ten years; you claim to be a pro and IIRC you have filed tax returns for your BJ play, so if as you claim you've won every year and have had no other jobs / sources of income then this will be evident on your returns.

You'd need to show him any correspondence from the IRS in order to help negate claims that you fabricated the returns: Mr. Nersesian should be able to sniff out a fraud were your to try to forge IRS letters, they're unique in style.

Once he's reviewed it he could either post his findings and conclusions directly online if he chooses to open an account or (more likely) he'd write a letter to you and to whom it may concern on his letterhead summarizing his findings and conclusions.

Not saying you need to do this but it would be quick, easy, and fairly definitive.

Your thoughts?

 

Do you think it's likely that Nersesian would do this as a favor to tewlj?

 

Why wouldn't he?

It would get his name out there even more in the AP community and attorneys just love positive advertising.

Were he to demand payment of a reasonable fee I'd hope KJ would pay it, or then again maybe the hat could be passes around and perhaps his detractors (e.g. Singer) would gladly pay the fee in order to learn the result.

But it wouldn't take the attorney too long to review and report, so any fee should be minimal.

 

Kew's middle name is "liar". So expecting any sort of integrity from anyone he uses as his familiar will hold less water than a pasta strainer.

 

Also, kew always claims he never has to prove that he wins, because he's an "AP", and AP's inherently are "winners".

He's special. People like myself and anyone else who does not play solely according to his belief system, are not special and are automatic losers. And if any or all of them claim to have won, then it is THEY who must prove their winning.

Kew tries to remain in his little safe space, where he says he never has to prove anything to anybody and that they MUST believe him, or he goes out of his mind! You could not pay him to leave it.