Baccarat Money Management concepts for Rustyshackleford

Rusty, as you can see from the varied responses it's really up to you. Based on your own goals, time constraints, and disposition.

But whatever you decide stick to the plan.

 

Prey, do tell, what is the purpose of the last 3rd of the bankroll?

Obviously if ya lose 2/3rd's it doesn't come into play, if ya win, if doesn't come into play???

 

JK


This happens to be a well proven MM option .



ND

 

id rather use a positive betting system that would funnel me the way to a high win rate if i stumble upon a streak or the terrible two's which way i decide to bet , i guess i am confusings hours mixed in with units of profit, the goal should be double 1/2 my bankroll of 250$ if 5$ is 1 unit, it shouldn't be that hard, im just thinking about a strategy betting banker for 5 shoes and seeing where im at after the 6th shoe -/+ is anyones guess in that period of time

 

Since 1996 I am using 3 well perfected positive baccarat systems plus the MM method . Not for publication on my part .



ND

 

I said it again and I'll say it before, if you have a winning style and yer playin for an income then do not set stop win'loss point. Just set an amount of shoe/hour yer willing to put in, stick to it, and know that over time you'll just keep grinding profits. You should consider yer entire roll to be in action and at stakes every time you buck up against the proposition. Either yer a serious cat or a recreational player, hey hey.

 

tell me the system i needs it!

 

BOLLOCKS listen up old timer, why the fuck would somebody say for example take $3000 to a casino, lose $2000 and not bring into play the last $1000,. If they are winning, then $1000 never comes into play. Might as well leave $1000 at home and play with everything you got. It literally make no sense, you'll still have a grind at home to pay yer bills.

As if I'd ask LOL

Ha ha, that's what they all say, pull the other one.. Considering you can't play online in the US and you live on the internet, you probably don't gamble, rather get your fix from forums, like a lot of other washed up players.

Really ND, who are you trying to kid?

 

A B & M casino is 3 miles from my home base .Full operational with 60 tables and the proportionate amount of machines .

A luxurious sports betting section opened there last week ..


ND

 

Looks like you had to tell ND this twice for him to grasp this!

​

If you're going to make a claim like this the onus is on you to expound and explain why this is so, don't you think?

And that goes for the rest of your one liner comments - (win x % in the first 10-11 decisions) - (I read the Baccarat instructions in 1996 been playing it ever since) !!! WTF. I've let it go because there has never anything really there with you but now you're giving advice to another player with nonsensical statements?

I mean if you're not going to help him with some ideas why not just keep your trap shut? Another "look at me" player like your friend John Blerg?

 

I have a certain amount of respect for long time poster ND, he's been around longer on the board than me. I always figured Roulette was his game. But if he starts making unsubstantiated bogus claims, chatting shit about Baccarat, I'm gonna call him out on it, already there are too many nuts filling that space.

 

if he can tell me his system im all ears hell i'll pay em back 3x fold depending how large the advantage is!

 

A lot of people would also. As you're a newbie you probably don't realise, there is no positive money management option that is viable. This discussion has been done to DEATH over the years by many brighter than ND. I've personally explored every possible bet positive option and a lot of hybrid option's, none, literally none offer any benefit whatsoever, unless you know which side will win the next hand(s) and you can guarantee a string of wins. Do the maths, he got carried away with himself.

 

Is that actually the truth? You don't need to know which side will win and to guarantee a string of wins. You need to know if your guesses, that don't know the future or guarantee anything, are in a phase of working or not. Have you personally explored that option? Or is this a case where you don't need to because this could not possibly work? You have your own way of figuring out bet selections in Baccarat. Have you actually tried to see the phase changes between win streaks and losing streak irregardless of the impossible tactic to predict the future? I suggest that you reconsider this so that you can in fact claim that you have tried everything.

 

These guys are the Ms. Cleo of the gambling world.

 

$Rusty ,


*It is waiting IN the BOX for you .

 

Off your meds again

Fuck off Mark, stop acting like Madonna seeking attention you fuckin' decrepit weirdo.

 

You're like somebody stepping in dog shit.



We have weird cunts, strange cunts, you have the title of the most negative cunt on the forum. You never have anything good to say, if things are so bad, why not find a high bridge and take a sky dive?

 

A guess is a guess. There's no way of evaluating the results of guessing. This is true whether or not the guesses produce positive or negative outcomes. I monitored about 4000 live bets and came to a 53% win rate. But I have no idea whether that will hold up over the next 4000 bets. By the term guessing we are stating that we cannot define selection or predict selection. On the other hand if we can define our selection it's not guessing is it?

So this goes to your statement about phase changes. You can either predict them or not. If you can predict then that is not guessing is it? If you can't define the so called phase change in unambiguous terms you are just guessing.

So it appears you're trying to have this both ways. In other words you are saying it's possible to predict guessing. That's an oxymoron.

P.S. I object to the word "irregardless "

 

Well there you go Rusty. Apparently he was shamed into giving something to you. I hope it is a value.