Roulette Reading Randomness

Yeah, isn't it wonderful? It takes out the weakest and costliest parts of society that are a strain on utopia. Euthanized for the greater good by magical batshit. It's a gift to the world. What's your problem? This is what is good for all nations that have socialized healthcare. It's good for the United Nations plan for global governance too. Do your part. Stay healthy or drop dead. I mean do your part economically speaking. Stay off the sick list. BTW, there is an ancillary feature to all this too. Nobody expected really smart people to avoid the vaccines. So rubbing out vast amounts of those forward thinking individuals will help take the load off of utopia too.

 

Think it was more to do with Bat Woman being careless with the hazmat suit. What's wrong with socialized health care, thankfully wealth does not matter in first world countries whether you get jabbed, or receive oxygen if the people need it.

You about to get your 3rd jab, could you afford to get any jab if if wasn't being handed out for free. What about those that live in Latin America, Africa, Far East, India, were the health care is ZERO unless you have means to pay, too bad if you lost all you wealth due to a life time of gambling.

I was thinking about this today, we could end up in a situation were the vast majority of those over 40~50 are dead, leaving the planet to be looked after by the young ones. As for the Covidots of which there are about 95M in the USA (mainly republican states), I laugh when I read they are dying off, so many are dropping, including a 43 super fit guy in the UK was was running up mountains a week before he perished, he did say before he passed "he wished he had been jabbed".

 

I'm just saying that they may have done actuary tables for not having to pay for health care for very old people and others that are already heavy on the care rolls. This is all about money. Suppose they searched until they could find a virus that takes out the elderly and the weak? I'm just cynically jaded. I believe they sat around and decided that this would be economically good if it got loose.

 

Doom and gloom from the ship of fools has now surfaced at a roulette forum.

 

Those cats from the ship of fools thought they had it all .

They are even giving back the deck chairs with the money.

 

Are you saying that the progression players are having it now blow up in their faces?

 

Yes it is blowing in their faces. They are looking for other EC games or new system posters .


EC are a vulnerable species to play around with.

A pattern of 3 including the the trigger is the limit of comfort.


That`s why a progression of 3-2-1shoud be the limit . If the 1 loses at the end no big loss.

 

Yep, 3,2,1 is very good for those that make bets in a row or targeted bets when things look great. Just from 3 & 2 you get 5 net wins. I'm looking into practicing to get just one net win and gone to eat a meal or see a show. I can have a ball on $50 a day extra. But if I use $5 chips and run the big bet at $90 or $100 then one win will put me much further ahead in a low expectation game like that. The casinos won't even know that I'm doing that to them. People are stuck in their lives keeping mortgages, property taxes, pets, plants and lawns, new this and new that trying to impress people that they don't even know. They need to make more money. Try setting yourself free. It's so easy to get one net win at a casino even mathZombies and trolls can do that.

 

ND in betting 3-2-1 is it not a bad percentage play in regards to you must hit 2 out of 3 to make units? I can under stand if you hit the first play for 3 but what happens if you lose the first are you still betting 3?

 

If I lose the first bet of 3 I am waiting for the next trigger and begin sgain with 3.


3 losses in a row terminates a session.


I am playing in sessions with winning 2 out of 3 sessions .

W W no third session

L W third session

W L third session

L L No third session. It was not my day.

 

Once I have reached my win goal I continue betting 1 until the first loss.

 

I invited the nomads here. Remote teaching begins.

 

A great invite by Gizmotron .

 

gads, they have hit this thread for more than 2000 views in the past four days. Now it's starting to look like a 1,000 per day.

 

The martingale and excessive long progression should be avoided .

 

Unless you still need to get it out of your system and hope it will one day work.

Every new gambler must exhaust themselves in this period.

It's a rite of passage.

 

I would recommend that new gamblers obtain some hard cover books on gambling and systems printed

before the turn of the century .


That would eliminate those " One only " system sellers .

Those books usually contain several recommended systems and methods of play.

 

Oooooh the silent majority, nice work gizmo, some can love you or hate you but the views are validation of your work. thanks for the thread I appreciate you. Cheers

 

Thanks,

I may have done a piss-poor job of explaining things. My personality is sort of like that of a Basic Training Drill Sargent that would rather yell at someone and rattle his cage than pussy foot around public emphasized decorum. There is no such thing as a Reading Randomness GI. So I put it out there with the goal that it be self taught. People that get skilled from this thread will go on to develop their own improved characteristics of randomness features and formations. The more that you can detect that is continuing, as a trend or a pattern and that remains solid, the easier this method gets. The easier this method gets the richer that you get. The richer that you get the poorer the casino gets.

It amazes me to see how this has flown under the radar so far. My guess is that the first thing casinos will try to do is no more hand written charts. After that they will require that if you are accused of Reading Randomness then you will be asked to leave. ... and Spike will be running around saying "I coined that phrase. I invented Reading Randomness." la de da.

 

Giz
I like the idea for reading random, but really stop players recording spins.
Well that wouldn't be a problem for zigzagging on e/c, r/b. If you watch a sequence of r/b using zigzag you'll soon see who's trending, giving your singles or the 2's.
It might give riddler a problem with top3