Feedback Rule violations

We do not delete posts here at GF.

You can find all your posts here.

 

No, you were just wrong as evidenced by the fact that you did not accept our wager.

 

Not anymore.

You attempted to launch a competing forum after we launched, and failed, and now you post here. We would never sell to you as we would never want to see this site fail. Furthermore, our generic .com domain name alone is worth significantly more than that.

 

Yes.

One can't be paranoid about facts.

It was, or at least attempted to be.

It was not private. Approving new members to avoid Spam is not the same thing as a private community requiring invitations to join like ours was at the start.

There is a big difference between "private" where only invited users can join (which was not the case of your site) and "not indexed by Google" because no other site cared to link to it due to its irrelevance (which was the case of your site).

This is false.

No need to ask. We can always back up what we say. Here is the proof you conveniently chose not to ask for:





(Click images to enlarge.)

The screenshots above speak for themselves. We have more proof if you would like to hang yourself further with the rope we continue to give you.

Here is the evidence it failed:

http://gamblingtalk.[removed].net/

See above.

No, one should always demand proof, boring or not, because talk is cheap. Anyone can make any false claim online just as you and GaryG do about us. So what matters at the end of the day is what can be proven.

Yes, because it failed.

No, it was open to everyone and did not require any invitation. This is another lie of yours. In fact, in your screenshot above you literally wrote "create as many fake accounts as you wish" on it.

The evidence above shows we are very well informed and much more so than you anticipated. What is laughable is your pathetic attempt to gaslight this community, your continued underestimation of us, and your lack of demand for proof in this instance presumably because you did not want to take the chance that we actually had the proof, which of course we did.

Yes, it did.

No, it didn't, as your site no longer exists but ours still does.

See screenshots above.

We won't claim that it was free because that was all you could afford since we cannot prove that. But the fact that it was free doesn't change the evidence above that so clearly disprove your lies. It certainly doesn't reflect positively on you that you used a free forum hosting service to launch a competing site and this is not something we recommend bragging about in the same thread where you are claiming you could buy this site.

That's a straw man argument you are making that is irrelevant to this matter and not true.


Junket King, if all of the above does not satisfy you as proof, we have more screenshots. Remember, not everyone is biased against us like you and GaryG are, so we regularly receive messages and material in private from members to support us. Just because we don't always show our hand doesn't mean we don't have cards to play with. Some of those cards are several years old.

Please do not reply with your usual rant about how we are arrogant simply because we just proved you lied to everyone about your failed competing forum. We simply gave you the rope. You are the one who chose to use that rope to hang himself.

You didn't lose our ear when you attempted and failed to start a competing forum, or when you spread lies about us, or when you continuously insulted us. However, this lie is so blatant, so egregious, and so easily disprovable, that we will let you have one final post in our Feedback section and then you will lose our ear. When a member loses our ear it means they will not be able to post in our Feedback section or PM us any more as we do not care to hear from proven liars with biased agendas as their Feedback is entirely worthless. Other than being unable to reach out to us, you will continue to have full access to our site.

Furthermore, if you continue spreading lies about us, we will not waste time chasing you around the site to correct them. We will simply add a "Compulsive Liar" tag and a signature with links to our posts disproving your lies so that your Signature chases you around instead of us.

You may have a last word. Your next post will be your last one in our Feedback section.

 

We made the wager coldly and seriously to prove you are not credible. We knew you would never accept it because we know that you know that we know what you wrote. You also have your tag-teaming partner Junket King confirming as much. Since we undressed you in public by exposing your lack of credibility, you went for an ad hominem attack that we are emotional because you have no argument in the case.

Yes, you do. Your actions, words, and attitude in this thread have confirmed it. You have a right to be biased against us and it won't affect our moderation of you, but likewise we have a right to call it out. The fact that you continue to claim we are fishy in this matter even after Junket King confirmed to you the same thing we told you is proof positive you are biased against us. An unbiased person would have accepted the truth and left it at that, not stoop to ad hominem attacks because they have no argument.

You care enough to continue to engage with us and stoop to ad hominem attacks because you didn't get your way after you violated our rules and were rightly sanctioned for it.

When a person without credibility that we've already publicly undressed accuses us of such, it is completely meaningless. If you actually thought we were fishy, you would accept the wager whose terms are extremely favorable to you. You won't accept the wager because you don't actually believe we are fishy, you are just unhappy that we didn't permit you to violate our rules and can't let go of the fact that you didn't get your way so you are having a tantrum.

If you never want to hear from us again, then simply respect our rules. You are not above them.

 

We've allowed member Junket King to have the last word. Members can draw their own conclusions. Junket King has now lost our ear and can no longer post in our Feedback section or PM us to give us feedback.

 

Except for the fact that another member corroborated what we stated regarding how you violated our rules, a point you have conveniently ignored as it makes your entire argument crumble. Or is your new argument now that you believe that witness is also "fishy" even though you have liked several of their posts in this thread?

We already addressed why earlier in this thread. You already know what you wrote, we don't need to prove to the author what they themselves wrote. You are not acting in good faith and want it just to continue arguing.

Not emotional, we flipped the burden around since we know you are acting in bad faith. It was calculating on our part with zero emotion since we already knew what the outcome would be (that you would not accept the wager because you already know you are wrong since you know exactly what you wrote). Furthermore, you bias makes you leave out what you had to gain from the wager, something orders of magnitude more beneficial than a ban here. You can't have it both ways and claim on the one hand that our site is so worthless that you wouldn't care to get it for free, and on the other consider it so valuable that you would never dare risk a simple banning from it. Again, this speaks to your credibility, or lack thereof. It also speaks to the fact that you are not acting in good faith.

You are the first person we've offered our entire site to over a wager, and all you have to do is simply be right about what you claimed you said. The fact that you didn't accept the wager speaks volumes about what you actually know you said. Moreover, you would not have been banned for calling for evidence (otherwise you would have already been banned), instead you would have been banned for accepting that we were wrong, and then losing that wager. Again, you won't take the wager because you know you will lose precisely because we are right. That's the only evidence needed considering you are the author, but remember we also have the corroborating witness on top of that, so you have absolutely no case. If we are wrong, then accept the wager. You won't because you know you are wrong.

No.

Correct. If we were emotional, then we would be vindictive. If we were vindictive, then we would be slowing down your access even though you do not actually deserve it in this instance. Instead, we are here still engaging with you in good faith even though you are not, and we are doing so because we care about our Feedback section.

That being said, people without credibility rarely admit when they are wrong, so we know you will not stop being argumentative regardless of the mounting evidence against you. Therefore, this thread is no longer productive and we will not be replying to it any further unless there is anything actually new added as there is nothing more for us to add since we are repeating the same thing over and over again.

Please respect our rules or you will be sanctioned again. You may have the last word.