Blackjack Singer the gunslinger

My favorite quote from kew: "I joined these forums to share experiences and learn from others"!!!!

My ass. He joined these forums because he has a messed up zero life, and figured he could concoct an online fantasy life to compensate for it. Problem has been, most forums get tired of his nonsense and BS envy of others, so they ban him. All it does is compound his hurt.

I agree with the educated assessment that he got his wimpy ass kicked somewhere/sometime, which is why he gets into all types of cyber fights. He knows the only one anywhere who doesn't ride his half-cooked ass is redietz--who's known as a weirdo.

 

Spot on Rob.. KJ joins forums so he can talk about his favorite subject KJ. KJ. KJ.

He doesn't want to learn shit. Mention anything other than Hilo and he throws a tantrum like a baby that crapped in his diaper and has been sitting in it for 4 hours.

Welcome to GF.

 

Thanks tater

KJ is also, as mickey said, very invested into who has what compared to him.

In a world where if you turn one way and then the other, we'll all probably bump into multiple people who have more than us, KJ is hurtfully bothered by that. Guess why. And if you say you approach gambling differently than he "claims" to and have made plenty of money in doing so, that turns him into a pathological liar about both you AND him.

It is, it seems, the only way he can cope with his inadequacies.

 

Rob. I thought the video with you and Alan was very good. One call tell Alan was a top notch reporter. You seemed to answer each question directly and honestly.

Of course, I didn't know what the hell you were talking about because machines are not my thing. My lady won $11k recently. There was 2 minutes to go in the MNF between Steelers and Bears. I went over to give her the two minute warning, so to speak.

Came back at games end and she'd hit big. She seems to win a helluva lot more than she looses.
One ticket was $11,111.11 which I thought was unique.

 

Welcome back Rob, since it looks like you haven't posted here in a bit. It is good to see Tater has a new friend. I will take a chance and attempt to turn down the heat and be civil, being Christmas and all. Hope you will reciprocate and maybe we can have a decent discussion.

The idea that I am bothered or jealous of other members on forums is pretty ludicrous. In the AP world as a card counter, I am bottom of the barrel as far as what I do, advantage I play and what I make. Almost every other fulltime AP and even some part-time AP's makes more than me (averages). Of those that either aren't AP's or are recreation players and have careers outside of gambling, it seems almost everyone on these forums has careers that pay 6 figures or more. With the average income about half that in the U.S. i don't know where all these lower income people are. Maybe they can't afford to gamble so they have no interest in gambling type forums. But of the people on forums, almost everyone, AP or not makes more money than I do. So please, let's just stop this "can't handle" or jealousy angle.

What I do have a problem with is people making claims of great winnings that is unsupported by the math. And Rob, I don't know how I can say this without you getting angry, but your math is some sort of alternative math that has been disproven long before you or I came along. If a player is playing a negative expectation game, it doesn't matter how they choose to alter their bets. Every wager is still negative expectation, and the totality is negative expectation. Claims of regular winning defies the math!.

Now if you and your wife had a good paying job and career outside of gambling and made good money, great for you. Honestly, I would not be jealous of that. Why would I. You worked and earned that. But your gambling claims (double up bug excluded) defy math.

And fairly or unfairly, because it is known who you are, once you start attacking people on a very personal level, people can and do look into you. And frankly the info publicly available does not mesh with your claims of 20 years. Maybe you didn't use banks and buried your money in holes in the yard. Maybe you hid everything from the government putting assets in others name. From movies I have seen, many Italians did that kind of thing. I don't know why? You claim to have worked for the government. Were you really an old mobster with that mobster mentality?

Now the biggie. The double up bug. This is the one claim of yours that doesn't defy math. Maybe you did "stumble" onto the play exactly as you said. Based on your history of untruthfulness, I and most others are not going to believe that on just your say so. And again, the publicly available information doesn't support that claim. You tried to support that claim with the Newell RV story and pictures. Come on Rob! Give me a break. That is a joke.

Anyway, I hope you have a good holiday with your family.

 

Congrats to your wife tater. $11,111.11 has got to mean something a bit more than just a jackpot total!

Kew, notwithstanding how you have a history of writing long and "unable to hit the nail on the head" rambling posts, you did actually come a little closer to pinning the tail on the donkey for a change.

I met a lot of people and learned a lot of things in my career that was spent mostly overseas, and there are reasons for everything I do--but not the type that get explained to others unless they are family or the closest of friends. I also immediately disclosed my real name (as opposed to my pen name--I've written 2 books) on my website when I got involved with vp in early 2000. People who "look me up" on those inaccurate snoop sites will always and only find what I want them to find unless there's mistakes. It took a ton of work to create and mask certain aspects of my background, and like it or not, the Newell did exist, and I truly did put down the DU play for several million+ in profit.

When you get around you realize not everyone is the same. I'm one who, because of my work history, I am cut from a different cloth. But just the simple fact that I've been happily married for over 43 years and have great children and grandchildren, tells people how normal I have been able to keep myself amid all the chaos.

My offering to you is this: you want more respect on forums? Stop fighting everyone who isn't you. People make claims of winning that go against the math and it bothers you? Accept the fact that there are plenty of -EV players who reside on the other side off the Bell Curve. Sure, there aren't THAT many. But they exist, and they do so because of certain quirks in their play that AP's wouldn't understand since it is out of their realm.

Simply don't go onto forums wound tight as a drum. And get off your doxxing kick. Nobody really cares who you are, who I am, who tater is, etc. Why? I've known stuff about you for several years now after you said you were gonna kill me, but I couldn't care less about spilling any of it and haven't. I couldn't anyway because of the way it came to me. I'm not even allowed to look you up even if that were important to me.

So see if you can put some effort into changing the perception you give others online. Then maybe the fighting will stop.

 

I have many friends. So roll your eyes back into your head. Wow. What an essay!

You, a self professed pro, call an RV dealership. Looked up private information on Singer. Evidently, claimed to do the same with me. Which was 100% wrong. AND I proved it. Singer, Crimm, Mdawg, T3, Norm, Shack, have nothing to prove and OWE you NOTHING.

For crissake, pull your panties from the crack of your ass.

 

Singer regales gentle readers with:

1) You only find on snoop sites what he wants people to find. LOL. Well, I do have friends who have scrubbed their internet presence. Usually they try to not leave traces of evictions, bankruptcies, and so on. I don't hold evictions and so on against Singer. I just find it curious that evictions and bankruptcies are the things he claims to have left for people to find. If that's the case, one can only imagine what he decided to scrub.

2) The idea that negative EV players exist on the positive side of variance because of "quirks in their play." There's a phrase that means zilch. Negative EV players exist on the positive side of variance because of variance. That's what variance is. "Quirks" have nothing to do with anything, but it's a cheap, non-specific word that sounds as if maybe you know what you're talking about. Perhaps Rob could elucidate on "quirks," you know, give some examples of "quirks" that are responsible for turning negative EV into winning.

So, Rob, are you visiting the mother-in-law for Christmas? Or is she moving in with you guys? I could drop in to visit, seeing as how I like to visit the Biltmore Christmas display each year, and she's right down the road. Let me know if you're heading to Asheville for Christmas. You should spend at least some time with her on holidays after her husband passed.

 

You're such a weirdo and a liar. Bankruptcies? Evictions? Let's see them. And mother-in-law? Died in 2000.

This is the kind of stuff that kew made up on VCT after he didn't like my not believing his "stories", and red runs with it because he didn't care that I knew his wife who chose to end it all rather than remain with him any longer, and that he has never once provided a sports pick BEFORE the game has been played. Of course, he's tried to sell his picks to me and others over there and has been exposed as such, which is another reason for his response in lies.

Oh...did I mention they don't like anybody who wins in casinos but those who play exactly like them?

 

Singer writes: Why would it bother some fellow AP's? One of them just asked you.

Boz said no one ever tells the entire truth about results, and jbjb said we can expect some to present dubious results regardless. So the table is set for you kew--just create any number you like! And I promise....redietz will continue to be your apologist either way.

Tater says: Some people need to live vicariously through others.

 

Pit bosses and dealers read forums. It only takes one to had out a life sentence and spread the word. It's their job to rid casinos of players who win consistently and/or too much too fast.

So you've got KJ quoting 6 figure incomes every year over a 15 year span. I think I read somewhere the head guy at Peppermill makes $144k. It's a game of people played with cards.
Most pit bosses or executive require a 4 year degree. So if someone with a HS education claims to earn double in half the time? You don't think that is going to piss them off?

Somehow KJ and his network believe they are helping each other and newbies by quoting incomes. I can't play anymore either because of KJ or someone in his network So more power to them. Post away.

 

And who can forget kew's famous "I can count two tables at a time", then was challenged by Alan Mendelson to meet him at Caesar's to prove it, and kew wasted zero time running for the hills spewing nothing but excuses.

My personal favorite concocted foolishness of his is how, when he loses--which is VERY infrequently--he nonetheless wins anyway since he is "banking EV".

Gimmee mercy!

 

Rob are you still vying for my attention? pathetic.

These two statements only confirm that you know nothing about blackjack card counting and even advantage play in general. .

Counting two tables for a short time, when conditions are just right is something that I shared that I do when I can. I didn't know it at the time, but it turns out a number of other professional players, several pretty well known, have since confirmed that they have at times done so as well. So yes, Alan, who obviously isn't a blackjack player challenged me. At no time did I agree to meet with him and show him anything. I am a professional player that has gone to great lengths to maintain my anonymity. So I am going to meet with Alan and allow him to film me play. Again, all this proves is both you and Alan haven't a clue how blackjack advantage play works. So no excuses and no running for the hills. I never agreed to that and never would as long as I am an active player.

Your comments on EV also prove you have absolutely no clue about blackjack advantage play. I never said "banking EV" but i don't object to using that term. The fact is that over the long run expected value and actual results will come in very close. That is how the math works. I didn't track EV in my early years, it is something I started doing when I relocated to Las Vegas and for my 12 years in Vegas I have won $1, 217,675 playing blackjack (more from non blackjack AP). And my blackjack EV over those 12 years is $1,187,045.

That is $1,217,675 won vs expectation (or EV) of $1,187, 045. Do you see how that works? Those numbers are almost identical. THAT is how EV or expectation works! To win a lot of money long-term, a player must accumulate a lot of EV.

And really, that is not just blackjack and card counting but ALL advantage play. That is the math behind advantage play. Of course you like some of the other fantasy goofballs, have claims that defy math and instead have plays that depend on special plays, and rabbit's feet and God knows what else. But real advantage play is about the mathematics and that is how real AP's win. And that means EV.

 

Hey Alan: Friendly observation. No malice meant. But you've left yourself wide open. Not necessarily a bad thing. I haven't heard anyone mention that you have an attorney in your own family. He is "littler" than you. No?

No one needs to listen 23 pages of gossip and Mr. V has annoited himself attorney, judge, and jury. I wonder how many gavels he's had to extract from ass his during his tenure.

Once again, KJ chooses to pick on a 70 year old man. And Dandruff pokes is head in the sand.

Anyway, the good news is anyone can run a report on you and discern shit from shinola for themselves.

​

 

Mickey Crimm;
Was KJ lying about being gay or is he lying now about being straight?

Tater says: I can't imagine anyone who could stand to be around thus squirrel turd for more than 5 minutes.

 

Mr V writes: Is the "new" KJ a liar or a hero?

Taters says: Geezeous V. Let him die. Here we go with more pages of the same old stuff we just read. You're feeding directly into KJs attention seeking sickness. Like a spoiled 6 year old.

KJ is a rat, A liar, and a coward. That is clear. I would think a man with your education would get it. For crissake. The quicker KJ is off forums. The better. Do you see BJTF missing his antics? WOV? They chug along just fine without him.

Dandruff do you really needs posts that bad?

 

Garnaby writes: There are two types of people you can't hurt. One is a Christian so far as standing by the truth until the bitter end. The other, a crazy, deranged motherfucker out to kill someone else for the same reason. Put them together, and, next, by all means, have at it. Let those "chips" fall where they may.

Tater says: The only person that scares me is a "devout Christian woman." They are very easy to spot cuz they will walk right up to you and say "I'm a devout Christian woman." They can do so much damage and affect so many lies with their tongues.

Now the most irritating person is the one who chooses to stick their nose in my biz. And then run like a mother fucker.

 

Mr V writes: I suspect he was doxxed as he claims although I haven't viewed the post(s) on another site that allegedly doxxed him.

Note my suggestion that he consider talking to an attorney began with "IF you can show..."

But yeah, IF he can prove his allegations I suspect he has an actionable claim against the doxxer for damages, something that would survive a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and should be able to go to the jury, if it ever got that far.

Hopefully he'll have made and kept copies of the doxxing post(s), or have another method of retrieving them.

He'll also need copies of the doxxer's pre-doxxing posts where he indicated his hostility toward KJ (need to show intent to damage).

This form of activity (preparing for and engaging in litigation) would seem to be right up KJ's alley, as there would be drama aplenty and with a bit of luck he'll get a six or seven figure verdict.

But the proof has to be solid and the attorney competent, and then there is the question of cost: will a competent attorney take this on a contingent fee?

Tater says: Geezeous V. At least do some research before you go flapping your gums. The alleged doxxing which wasn't up for very long only gave his first name, a building address.

There are hundreds of tenants in this building. KJ later wrote the same info himself. And gave his own personal identification.

Great case. Dip shit.